Of course, I support new research, that can improve suffering peoples' lives. But at what cost?
What angers me the most, is that in this case there are alternative solutions. They say eat fish. Fantastic. Make it even more likely for the ecosystem to collapse. Just go right on ahead. But, what they are talking about is Omega 3, and it's properties. I hear about this compound quite a bit, Omega 3. Fish, happen to have the highest concentration of the stuff, thus when something 'magical' is discovered about the substance, they tell people to eat fish. You realize there are other things that contain Omega 3? Such as seaweed. Is seaweed endangered? Can we cultivate seaweed independently of the ocean? YES. So what should we be encouraging people to eat: seaweed? Or fish, that are already on the brink of collapse?
What do you think would be the wise decision?
Wikimedia commons (labeled for reuse) |
No comments:
Post a Comment